Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Dokumenter
- Virtue reversed_ Principal argumentative vices in political debat
Indsendt manuskript, 278 KB, PDF-dokument
Contributing to an understanding of the true virtues of argumentation, this paper
sketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or ‘malpractices’ that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.
sketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or ‘malpractices’ that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Titel | Virtues of Argumentation : Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013 |
Redaktører | Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński |
Antal sider | 9 |
Udgivelsessted | Windsor |
Forlag | University of Windsor |
Publikationsdato | 15 jun. 2014 |
ISBN (Elektronisk) | 9780920233665 |
Status | Udgivet - 15 jun. 2014 |
Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk
Ingen data tilgængelig
ID: 132941871