Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Rhetorical Argumentation : The Copenhagen School. / Kock, Christian Erik J (Redaktør); Lantz, Marcus (Redaktør).

Windsor, ON : Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor, 2023. 484 s. (Windsor Studies in Argumentation).

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kock, CEJ & Lantz, M (red) 2023, Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School. Windsor Studies in Argumentation, bind 13, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON. https://doi.org/10.22329/wsia.13.2023

APA

Kock, C. E. J., & Lantz, M. (red.) (2023). Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor. Windsor Studies in Argumentation https://doi.org/10.22329/wsia.13.2023

Vancouver

Kock CEJ, (ed.), Lantz M, (ed.). Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor, 2023. 484 s. (Windsor Studies in Argumentation). https://doi.org/10.22329/wsia.13.2023

Author

Kock, Christian Erik J (Redaktør) ; Lantz, Marcus (Redaktør). / Rhetorical Argumentation : The Copenhagen School. Windsor, ON : Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor, 2023. 484 s. (Windsor Studies in Argumentation).

Bibtex

@book{0b5fe049465d4d0f8a35758b24904340,
title = "Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School",
abstract = "Aristotle taught us that rhetoric is centered around deliberation, and he emphasized that we may only deliberate about things that we can in fact undertake (Rhetoric, 1357a, and elsewhere, mainly in the ethical works). Rhetorical argumentation is, in its essence, the bedrock of such deliberation: It provides the reasons for and against various choices, which we exchange when, in some human collective, we are to decide on a course of action. To be sure, not all rhetoric is argumentation. But all deliberative discourse uses rhetoric, and in such discourse rhetorical argumentation is central (and should be, we might add). Hence, we have found it in place to present a collection of work that revolves around the conception of rhetorical argumentation just outlined and asserts the centrality of that notion in any theory of argumentation.",
editor = "Kock, {Christian Erik J} and Marcus Lantz",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.22329/wsia.13.2023",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780920233986",
volume = "13",
series = "Windsor Studies in Argumentation",
publisher = "Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Rhetorical Argumentation

T2 - The Copenhagen School

A2 - Kock, Christian Erik J

A2 - Lantz, Marcus

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Aristotle taught us that rhetoric is centered around deliberation, and he emphasized that we may only deliberate about things that we can in fact undertake (Rhetoric, 1357a, and elsewhere, mainly in the ethical works). Rhetorical argumentation is, in its essence, the bedrock of such deliberation: It provides the reasons for and against various choices, which we exchange when, in some human collective, we are to decide on a course of action. To be sure, not all rhetoric is argumentation. But all deliberative discourse uses rhetoric, and in such discourse rhetorical argumentation is central (and should be, we might add). Hence, we have found it in place to present a collection of work that revolves around the conception of rhetorical argumentation just outlined and asserts the centrality of that notion in any theory of argumentation.

AB - Aristotle taught us that rhetoric is centered around deliberation, and he emphasized that we may only deliberate about things that we can in fact undertake (Rhetoric, 1357a, and elsewhere, mainly in the ethical works). Rhetorical argumentation is, in its essence, the bedrock of such deliberation: It provides the reasons for and against various choices, which we exchange when, in some human collective, we are to decide on a course of action. To be sure, not all rhetoric is argumentation. But all deliberative discourse uses rhetoric, and in such discourse rhetorical argumentation is central (and should be, we might add). Hence, we have found it in place to present a collection of work that revolves around the conception of rhetorical argumentation just outlined and asserts the centrality of that notion in any theory of argumentation.

U2 - 10.22329/wsia.13.2023

DO - 10.22329/wsia.13.2023

M3 - Anthology

SN - 9780920233986

VL - 13

T3 - Windsor Studies in Argumentation

BT - Rhetorical Argumentation

PB - Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor

CY - Windsor, ON

ER -

ID: 367707316