Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning

Standard

Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy. / Grodal, Torben Kragh.

I: Style (DeKalb), Bind 42, Nr. 2-3, 2008, s. 192-196.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning

Harvard

Grodal, TK 2008, 'Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy', Style (DeKalb), bind 42, nr. 2-3, s. 192-196.

APA

Grodal, T. K. (2008). Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy. Style (DeKalb), 42(2-3), 192-196.

Vancouver

Grodal TK. Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy. Style (DeKalb). 2008;42(2-3):192-196.

Author

Grodal, Torben Kragh. / Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy. I: Style (DeKalb). 2008 ; Bind 42, Nr. 2-3. s. 192-196.

Bibtex

@article{14343410dd8411ddb5fc000ea68e967b,
title = "Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy",
abstract = "The article is an invited response to a target article by Joseph Carroll entitled {"}An evolutionary paradigm for literary study{"}. It argues that the target article  misuse the fact that works of art are based on adaptations that were fitness-enhancing in the era of evolutionary adaptations to claim that great work of art are also automatically fitness-enhancing in the present day environment, at that there are simple correllations between whether a work of art has a high aesthetic value and whether it is fitness-enhancing or not.  Keywords :  Evolutionary aesthetics, film theory, literary theory, naturalist fallacy",
author = "Grodal, {Torben Kragh}",
note = "titlen p{\aa} indl{\ae}gget er fejlagtigt trykt som: Evoluntionary theory, ikke som det korrekte: Evolutionary theory",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "192--196",
journal = "Style",
issn = "0039-4238",
publisher = "Pennsylvania State University Press",
number = "2-3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolutionary theory and the naturalist fallacy

AU - Grodal, Torben Kragh

N1 - titlen på indlægget er fejlagtigt trykt som: Evoluntionary theory, ikke som det korrekte: Evolutionary theory

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The article is an invited response to a target article by Joseph Carroll entitled "An evolutionary paradigm for literary study". It argues that the target article  misuse the fact that works of art are based on adaptations that were fitness-enhancing in the era of evolutionary adaptations to claim that great work of art are also automatically fitness-enhancing in the present day environment, at that there are simple correllations between whether a work of art has a high aesthetic value and whether it is fitness-enhancing or not.  Keywords :  Evolutionary aesthetics, film theory, literary theory, naturalist fallacy

AB - The article is an invited response to a target article by Joseph Carroll entitled "An evolutionary paradigm for literary study". It argues that the target article  misuse the fact that works of art are based on adaptations that were fitness-enhancing in the era of evolutionary adaptations to claim that great work of art are also automatically fitness-enhancing in the present day environment, at that there are simple correllations between whether a work of art has a high aesthetic value and whether it is fitness-enhancing or not.  Keywords :  Evolutionary aesthetics, film theory, literary theory, naturalist fallacy

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 42

SP - 192

EP - 196

JO - Style

JF - Style

SN - 0039-4238

IS - 2-3

ER -

ID: 9589940